The "脑补推演" core the user described — re-run the same task many times and
learn from the contrast between good and bad rollouts:
- rollout.py: multi_rollout(task, k) runs K scored attempts; RolloutSet exposes
best/worst/spread/pass_rate. contrastive_reflect picks the highest-spread
tasks (some attempts passed, some failed — most informative) and asks the
optimizer what the GOOD attempts did that the BAD ones didn't, distilling a
general rule. Far stronger signal than a single failure.
- consolidate(rollouts_k>1) uses contrastive reflection (falls back to
single-shot reflect if it yields nothing).
- budget.py: Budget(max_tokens|max_minutes) tracks spend; plan_depth() derives
(nights, rollouts_k) from a token budget. run_gbrain gains --rollouts-k,
--budget-tokens, --budget-minutes (auto-plans depth).
3 new tests (rollout stats, budget+plan, contrastive stub). 26 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bring SkillOpt's epoch-wise slow/meta update (paper §3.6) into the sleep engine
as skillopt/sleep/slow_update.py — import-light, driven through the Backend
abstraction (mock/claude/codex):
- Reuses the main repo's protected-field markers
<!-- SLOW_UPDATE_START --> ... <!-- SLOW_UPDATE_END --> so the artifact is
compatible; step-level edits never touch this field.
- run_slow_update compares behavior under the first-night vs final skill across
the val tasks, groups into improved/regressed/persistent/stable, and asks the
optimizer to distill durable longitudinal guidance (refining prior text).
- Wired into run_gbrain.run_seed AFTER the nights loop, gated by slow_update=True
and run REGARDLESS of gate_mode — this is what preserves long-term memory even
when the user turns the hard gate OFF (the user's slot_date=slow-update intent).
2 new tests (protected-field round-trip, stub-backend synthesis). 23 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Data-split refactor (the anti-overfitting foundation the user asked for):
- TaskRecord gains split∈{train,val,test} and origin∈{real,dream}.
- assign_splits: real tasks deterministically split into val/test (disjoint);
DREAM-augmented tasks (origin='dream') NEVER enter val/test — they only go to
train. val gates updates; test is the final held-out measure.
- gbrain loader maps its held-out.jsonl -> test, benchmark.jsonl -> train/val,
so the gbrain held-out stays the true final score.
- consolidate(): train drives reflect, val gates; adds gate_mode='off' (greedy,
no hard filter) reporting val movement (greedy_improved/regressed/flat).
- run_gbrain/transfer/experiment score on test (val fallback); run_gbrain gains
--gate on|off. Legacy replay/holdout names normalized.
New test proves dream tasks never land in val/test. 21 tests pass; mock
experiment + gate=off both green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 4th gbrain seed (quick-answerer) is judged by tool_called=search: the agent
must ACTUALLY call a search tool. Add an honest tool loop:
- Backend.attempt_with_tools(task, skill, memory, tools) -> (response, tools_called)
- Claude: exposes a real ./search shell shim, runs with --allowedTools Bash in a
clean cwd; detects the call from the shim's log (not a self-reported marker).
- Codex: same shim under `exec --sandbox workspace-write`.
- Mock: deterministic — "calls" a tool iff skill/memory instructs it (for CI).
- replay_one routes tasks with a tool_called check through the tool loop and
feeds detected calls to the rule judge; ReplayResult gains tools_called.
Verified live (Claude haiku): deficient skill -> tools_called=[] hard=0;
learned "must run ./search" rule -> tools_called=['search'] hard=1.0.
20 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The default sweep direct plan now uses a DualBackend (Sonnet optimizer proposes
edits, Haiku target runs tasks) — the SkillOpt-faithful and more reliable setup,
since a weak self-optimizing model (Haiku-as-optimizer) produced flaky JSON.
report.py renders the optimizer->target pairing in the direct table.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- reflect() now retries once with a firmer "JSON only" instruction when the
first reply doesn't parse to a non-empty array. A transient non-JSON reply
otherwise wastes a whole night (gate sees no edits -> reject), which made
weak optimizers (Haiku) flaky across runs.
- FINAL_REPORT.md: document the context-leak discovery honestly; Codex cells
stand (clean), Claude cells recomputed under strict isolation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The clean-cwd + --disallowedTools isolation was NOT enough: the user's GLOBAL
skills (~/.claude/skills) are injected regardless of cwd, so reflect/attempt
still sometimes replied with a list of installed skills instead of JSON edits
(advisor reflect returned 21KB of skill descriptions, n_edits=0 -> gate reject).
Add --bare (skip hooks/LSP/plugins) and --disable-slash-commands (disable all
skills). Verified: the optimizer now returns clean JSON. Re-validating all
seeds with the truly-isolated backend; prior Claude numbers are being recomputed
honestly (some earlier "successes" were partly leak-assisted).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Critical correctness fix found by debugging the thorough-analyst failure:
* `claude -p` was running with the AMBIENT Claude Code project context (the
repo's CLAUDE.md, installed skills, tools). The optimizer/target calls were
polluted — reflect once replied with a list of the user's installed skills
instead of JSON edits. Now ClaudeCliBackend._call runs ISOLATED: a clean temp
cwd, --disallowedTools '*', --exclude-dynamic-system-prompt-sections. This is
essential for the backend to be trustworthy and reproducible.
* reflect prompt: translate failing rule-judge criteria into plain English
(max_chars=1200 -> "the ENTIRE response must be at most 1200 characters") and
require CONCRETE, verbatim thresholds in proposed rules (not "respect limits").
* attempt prompt: treat the Learned-preferences block as HARD CONSTRAINTS that
override earlier conflicting skill text.
Earlier Claude results predate this fix and are being re-validated clean; the
Codex backend was never affected (it runs in its own exec context).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- skillopt-sleep-plugin/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json so the plugin is
installable via `/plugin marketplace add ./skillopt-sleep-plugin`.
- README install section (clone -> add marketplace -> install -> /sleep status).
- docs/sleep/FINAL_REPORT.md: the consolidated presented results doc (real
Claude+Codex, transfer, and the honest thorough-analyst failure + fix).
- sweep.py flushes stdout for live monitoring.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- sweep.py: run many (backend, model, seed, transfer-pair) configs sequentially,
append each result to JSONL incrementally (resumable, interrupt-safe).
- report.py: render the sweep JSONL into a presented Markdown scorecard with
direct-improvement and cross-model-transfer tables.
- reflect prompt now tells the optimizer its edits are APPENDED (can't delete the
base skill text), so on a conflict it must write a forceful OVERRIDE rule.
Diagnosed from a real failure: thorough-analyst (needs <=1200 chars) kept its
edits rejected because the base "be exhaustive" line won; a verified override
("HARD LIMIT ... supersedes") makes Haiku obey (1194/880 chars -> hard=1.0).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three additions driven by the goal of price-aware, model-flexible sleep:
1. DualBackend + build_backend(): route attempt->TARGET model and
reflect/judge->OPTIMIZER model (SkillOpt's target-vs-optimizer split).
gbrain runner gains --optimizer-backend/-model + --target-backend/-model.
2. run_transfer.py: sleep-scenario cross-model transfer. Optimize a skill on a
SOURCE model (e.g. cheap haiku), freeze it, evaluate held-out on a TARGET
model (e.g. expensive sonnet) with no further optimization — plus a direct
reference. Mirrors the SkillOpt paper's transfer table; quantifies the
"optimize cheap overnight, deploy anywhere" value prop.
3. llm_miner.py: turn real harvested transcripts into TaskRecords WITH checkable
rule/rubric judges, wired into the cycle for non-mock backends, so real-data
lift becomes measurable (heuristic miner remains the no-API fallback).
Fixed a str.format brace bug the new unit test caught.
19 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Upgrade from mock-only to REAL multi-backend validation:
Backends (skillopt/sleep/backend.py):
- CliBackend base: shared attempt/judge/reflect prompts, response cache,
token accounting. Subclasses implement only _call().
- ClaudeCliBackend: drives `claude -p --output-format text`.
- CodexCliBackend: drives the REAL @openai/codex `exec -o <file>` for clean
output; resolve_codex_path() skips the hermes wrapper at ~/.local/bin/codex.
- reflect() now aggregates the exact failing judge criteria into the prompt
(gbrain's lesson: tell the optimizer what the scorer rewards).
Rule judges (skillopt/sleep/judges.py): gbrain-compatible local scorers
(section_present / regex / max_chars / contains / tool_called) — held-out
scoring with no judge-API spend. TaskRecord gains a `judge` field +
reference_kind="rule".
gbrain-evals adapter (experiments/gbrain_bench.py, run_gbrain.py): load
garrytan/gbrain-evals skillopt-v1 deficient skills + train/held-out task
sets and run our consolidate() loop against the SAME suite gbrain scores.
REAL results (docs/sleep/real_api_results.md), brief-writer seed, 1 night:
- Claude (Haiku): held-out 0.00 -> 1.00
- Codex: held-out 0.00 -> 0.67
Both proposed a correct, general format rule into the protected LEARNED block.
CLI: --backend {mock,claude,codex}, --codex-path, --model; experiment +
gbrain runners gain --limit-* cost controls. 17 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Yifan Yang