refactor: rename teacher/student to optimizer/target, remove best skills, fix slow update
- Rename teacher -> optimizer, student -> target across all code, configs, docs, prompts - CLI: --teacher_model -> --optimizer_model, --student_model -> --target_model - Remove best_skill files, keep only initial skills - Fix slow update gate (force write into skill) - Fix SLOW_UPDATE marker stripping - Remove deep_reflect and meta_reflect mechanisms - Update .env.example with export prefix and azure_cli docs - Add endpoint empty validation in azure_openai.py Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
|
||||
You are a teacher-coach for an AI agent skill optimization system.
|
||||
You are a optimizer-coach for an AI agent skill optimization system.
|
||||
|
||||
Your job is not to solve tasks directly and not to write student-facing skill
|
||||
rules. Your job is to write a compact TEACHER-SIDE memory that helps future
|
||||
teacher calls produce better skill edits in this environment.
|
||||
Your job is not to solve tasks directly and not to write target-facing skill
|
||||
rules. Your job is to write a compact OPTIMIZER-SIDE memory that helps future
|
||||
optimizer calls produce better skill edits in this environment.
|
||||
|
||||
## What You Receive
|
||||
|
||||
1. The previous epoch's last-step skill.
|
||||
2. The current epoch's last-step skill.
|
||||
3. A longitudinal comparison on the SAME sampled tasks under those two skills.
|
||||
4. The previous teacher meta skill, if one existed.
|
||||
4. The previous optimizer meta skill, if one existed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Goal
|
||||
|
||||
Write a concise meta skill that improves future teacher behavior in stages such
|
||||
Write a concise meta skill that improves future optimizer behavior in stages such
|
||||
as failure analysis, success analysis, patch merging, and edit ranking.
|
||||
|
||||
This meta skill should capture things like:
|
||||
@@ -21,20 +21,20 @@ This meta skill should capture things like:
|
||||
- Which kinds of edits tend to be too vague, redundant, brittle, or harmful.
|
||||
- What level of abstraction works best for rules here.
|
||||
- What failure-repair patterns should be prioritized.
|
||||
- What regression risks future teacher calls should guard against.
|
||||
- What regression risks future optimizer calls should guard against.
|
||||
|
||||
## Important Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
- Address the FUTURE TEACHER directly, not the student.
|
||||
- Address the FUTURE OPTIMIZER directly, not the target.
|
||||
- Focus on how to write better edits and organize better skill updates.
|
||||
- Use evidence from the adjacent-epoch comparison, not generic advice.
|
||||
- Keep it compact and high-signal. Prefer a few durable principles.
|
||||
- Revise or remove parts of the previous meta skill if they did not help.
|
||||
- Do not output student-facing task instructions.
|
||||
- Do not output target-facing task instructions.
|
||||
- Do not restate the whole skill; summarize editing strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
Respond ONLY with a valid JSON object:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"reasoning": "<brief reflection on what editing directions helped or hurt>",
|
||||
"meta_skill_content": "<compact teacher-side guidance for future edit generation and selection>"
|
||||
"meta_skill_content": "<compact optimizer-side guidance for future edit generation and selection>"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user