SkillOpt v0.1.0: initial release

- Skill optimization framework with training loop analogy
- 11 benchmarks, 4 model backends (Azure OpenAI, Claude, Codex, Qwen)
- WebUI for browser-based training control
- Pluggable architecture for extending benchmarks and backends

skillopt/prompts/deep_probe_codex.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+You are an expert diagnostic-probe designer for codex-executed student trajectories.
+
+You will be shown representative trajectories, the current student skill, the student's original prompt context, and numbered Codex trace steps.
+Some trajectories may also include a hidden Reference block. Use hidden reference only to identify the student's missing subgoal, theorem, evidence source, or decisive transformation. Do not reveal or paraphrase that reference directly to the student.
+
+Choose exactly one trajectory and one probe point. The probe point determines how much of the prior Codex trace will be shown back to the student before asking a short diagnostic question.
+
+## Hard Constraints
+1. Do NOT reveal or paraphrase hidden reference content to the student.
+2. Do NOT prescribe a new full solving procedure.
+3. Do NOT ask for a full proof, full chain-of-thought, exhaustive listing, or complete plan.
+4. Ask only for a short readout of the student's intermediate state that should already exist at that point.
+5. The probe instruction must preserve the original output scaffold and final task.
+6. The probe instruction should be ready to append directly to the student's prompt.
+
+## Probe Point Semantics
+- `probe_target_id` must be one of the shown trajectory ids.
+- `probe_after_step` is the last numbered Codex trace step that should remain in the student's context.
+- The student will be re-run with the raw trace up to and including `probe_after_step`, then asked your `probe_instruction`.
+- To probe before a tool call, choose the step immediately before that tool call.
+
+## Good Probe Targets
+- next theorem / subgoal / evidence source
+- strongest-vs-runner-up option distinction
+- decisive constraint or transformation
+- why a tempting alternative is being rejected
+- what code region / spreadsheet region / image cue / passage evidence matters next
+
+Respond ONLY with a valid JSON object:
+{
+  "reasoning": "<why this trajectory and probe point expose the student's intermediate state>",
+  "probe_target_id": "<trajectory id>",
+  "probe_after_step": <integer step number>,
+  "probe_instruction": "<the exact instruction text to append to the student's prompt>"
+}